Skip to main content

Response to Tyler's Media Critique

I was reading through blogs, searching to find one to respond to, and when i opened Tylers blog, the first thing I saw was his Media Critique. He is critiquing Fox News, for a story on a topic that, in his opinion, is not newsworthy. I agree that the individual story doesn't effect a lot of people for a long time, but the overall topic of police brutality is a recurring problem that has been effecting a lot of people for a very long time. So, what can we do to draw attention to the bigger picture and issue at hand, rather than the individual stories that are often skimmed over because they have become so common?
As citizens and journalists, we can and should emulate what many people have recently done with different topics-create a movement. Creating a broader subject for all of these frequent stories to fall under would not only make them more newsworthy, but also draw awareness to them and effectively move society towards change, rather than continuing the cycle that many tragic events fall into; violent occurrence, uproar of condolences, people demand action, people forget, no action is taken, occurrence happens again, and the cycle continues.
As stated in the 7 Yardsticks of Journalism by gradethenews.org, "Journalism's purpose, according to ethical codes like that of the Society of Professional Journalists, is to help readers and viewers make sense of pressing issues and events that affect them." Because a situation like police brutality has the potential to affect may, many people, it is the duty of the journalist to create this larger category for the myriad instances of each event to fit into. Doing this would have many benefits for citizens, as well as  fix the violation that Tyler pointed out in his critique. Great job, Tyler! Check out his entry here: http://instructionmanual18.blogspot.com/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Challenges of a Good Journalist

One of the very first topics we discussed in class was what makes good journalism. More specifically, we talked about the elements and yardsticks, which are guidelines for journalists to follow in order to produce good journalism. One of these guidelines was outlining that for news to be effectively received and understood by an audience, it must be attention holding. Lets face it, not every newsworthy story is interesting. I'll be the first to admit that I would much rather read about a mysterious disappearance than what tax-bill was denied. Thats just part of human nature. My point here is that journalists have a much bigger job than a lot of people realize. It is very common for the most important news to be somewhat boring, and for the not so newsworthy content to be very engaging. This is where good journalism comes in. I am not saying that every story has to keep the reader on the edge of their seat, however, it is a large responsibility of the writer to hold attention long...

A Closer Look at Both Sides of Mass Communication

As a technologically developed and advanced culture, we are able to identify and utilize multiple mass communication outlets at any given time or place. These timeless messages often serve a valid and important purpose, however they are very easy to abuse, and can also have negative impacts. After the class discussion regarding mass communication, I sat down to create a written analyzation of these benefits and drawbacks. To think positively, mass communication has innumerable benefits that the world, and modern society, would struggle to function without. One example of this is the spread of art and culture, as well as the interdependence that mass communication globally creates. Especially through public social media, mass communication is used to connect with people across the globe almost immediately. Every day thousands of ideas, information, and aspects of culture are diffused, making everyone with access to public accounts aware of what is going on in places that they are unab...

The Magic of Human Communication

As I started to zone out in the middle of a lecture on Wednesday, Mr. Miller changed voice tone, keeping me engaged, and proceeded to explain the process of human communication. He discussed how an idea stimulates the brain, and if the idea is verbalized, different vibrations occur, travel across the room, etcetera. I started thinking about something that is rarely thought about or discussed-human communication-and how crazy it really is. The fact that our brains can so quickly turn thoughts into a series of vibrations strung together, that the travel almost instantly to a receiver, who hears and processes those vibrations, and then responds, often without hesitation, repeating the process.