Skip to main content

Media Critique

The top headlines on the Courier Journal website habitually regard topics that are not newsworthy, therefore violating the first basic yardstick of journalism; newsworthiness. The specific headline being focused on also lacks a wide variety of sources, which is a violation of the context yardstick.
Newsworthiness outlines the obligation and responsibility of the journalist to make the topic of an article have "... a direct and lasting informational impact on a wide audience," and pertain to a "core" topic. There are myriad top headlines on the Courier Journal website on any given day, that do not meet these standards. For example, the top headline for nearly the entire day Sunday was, "Your child can be an author in this funky hot air balloon, underwater writing clinic."  Seeing as this story encourages and advertises the Young Authors Greenhouse, it falls under the promotional category. According to gradethenews.org, promotional topics are considered peripheral, and therefore not newsworthy. Even though it may apply or interest all of Portland and surrounding areas, qualifying it as reaching a wide audience, it fails to meet full criteria for the particular yardstick (newsworthiness).
To meet the standards of newsworthiness, Courier Journal could have placed this story under the Entertainment category of their website, rather than the news category. Topics that qualify for the news category would include politics, government action, natural disaster, education, economics, crime/justice, medical, environmental, housing, transportation, science/tech, important social issues, major fires or accidents, weather, or consumer reporting.
The journalist of this article also failed to sufficiently fulfill the requirements of the context yardstick. Context calls on journalists to gather and report on information gained from multiple sources. Throughout the article, the author often relays information from the executive director and program manager- which are two good sources, however, it would have greatly enhanced the quality of the article to include more perspectives. To meet the standards of context, the journalist could have interviewed residents of Portland and surrounding areas, current participants of similar organizations, and people who plan on utilizing the program, rather than just the founder and director.
These two flaws are the main reason I chose to critique the Courier Journal and one of its journalists, however I sincerely respect it as a reliable, trustworthy local media outlet.

Check out the article here: https://www.courier-journal.com/story/money/louisville-city-living/2018/09/16/young-authors-greenhouse-open-writing-clinic-portland-louisville/1279196002/



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Challenges of a Good Journalist

One of the very first topics we discussed in class was what makes good journalism. More specifically, we talked about the elements and yardsticks, which are guidelines for journalists to follow in order to produce good journalism. One of these guidelines was outlining that for news to be effectively received and understood by an audience, it must be attention holding. Lets face it, not every newsworthy story is interesting. I'll be the first to admit that I would much rather read about a mysterious disappearance than what tax-bill was denied. Thats just part of human nature. My point here is that journalists have a much bigger job than a lot of people realize. It is very common for the most important news to be somewhat boring, and for the not so newsworthy content to be very engaging. This is where good journalism comes in. I am not saying that every story has to keep the reader on the edge of their seat, however, it is a large responsibility of the writer to hold attention long...
Post a Comment
Read more

the future of technological innovation

As our class discussed how the immersive experience of going to a movie theatre is not yet a reality that is commonly manipulated, I started to wonder how long it would be before society did reach that point. It's a little crazy to think that only a few decades ago, many people didn't even have television in their homes, much less cell phones. While I recognize that still many, many people still do not have easy access to these commodities, it is also crazy to think about what it will be like just a few decades in the future. Will our grandchildren marvel over the fact that we didn't have home cinemas? Will they not know a world without autonomous cars? Do we need to shift our focus on making basic needs more widespread in less developed countries before moving on to futuristic innovations? Maybe, the fact that movies have prevailed as a popular attraction and communication resource despite the internet, pop music, etc. suggests that they will continue to do so through doze...
Post a Comment
Read more

generation z

Another thought that was sparked by our joined class discussion, and more specifically the thoughtful student input- is just how pivotal our generation is to the progression of our nation. The things we are thinking of and doing at this age is something that no other generation has ever thought or done, and that is in large part a result of the environment that we are growing up in. Unlike previous generations, I would not be crazy to say that every single teen today has seen, experienced, been impacted by, or recognized inequity, and with that said I would also not be crazy to say that a number of us have spoken out about it in some way, whether passively or as a leader. These circumstances and actions have already established the power of our generation across the country and across the world. I do think that whether those in power acknowledge it or not, they definitely recognize our pivotal generation, and many probably feel threatened by it. Recognition or not, as displayed in toda...
Post a Comment
Read more