Skip to main content

Media Critique

The top headlines on the Courier Journal website habitually regard topics that are not newsworthy, therefore violating the first basic yardstick of journalism; newsworthiness. The specific headline being focused on also lacks a wide variety of sources, which is a violation of the context yardstick.
Newsworthiness outlines the obligation and responsibility of the journalist to make the topic of an article have "... a direct and lasting informational impact on a wide audience," and pertain to a "core" topic. There are myriad top headlines on the Courier Journal website on any given day, that do not meet these standards. For example, the top headline for nearly the entire day Sunday was, "Your child can be an author in this funky hot air balloon, underwater writing clinic."  Seeing as this story encourages and advertises the Young Authors Greenhouse, it falls under the promotional category. According to gradethenews.org, promotional topics are considered peripheral, and therefore not newsworthy. Even though it may apply or interest all of Portland and surrounding areas, qualifying it as reaching a wide audience, it fails to meet full criteria for the particular yardstick (newsworthiness).
To meet the standards of newsworthiness, Courier Journal could have placed this story under the Entertainment category of their website, rather than the news category. Topics that qualify for the news category would include politics, government action, natural disaster, education, economics, crime/justice, medical, environmental, housing, transportation, science/tech, important social issues, major fires or accidents, weather, or consumer reporting.
The journalist of this article also failed to sufficiently fulfill the requirements of the context yardstick. Context calls on journalists to gather and report on information gained from multiple sources. Throughout the article, the author often relays information from the executive director and program manager- which are two good sources, however, it would have greatly enhanced the quality of the article to include more perspectives. To meet the standards of context, the journalist could have interviewed residents of Portland and surrounding areas, current participants of similar organizations, and people who plan on utilizing the program, rather than just the founder and director.
These two flaws are the main reason I chose to critique the Courier Journal and one of its journalists, however I sincerely respect it as a reliable, trustworthy local media outlet.

Check out the article here: https://www.courier-journal.com/story/money/louisville-city-living/2018/09/16/young-authors-greenhouse-open-writing-clinic-portland-louisville/1279196002/



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Challenges of a Good Journalist

One of the very first topics we discussed in class was what makes good journalism. More specifically, we talked about the elements and yardsticks, which are guidelines for journalists to follow in order to produce good journalism. One of these guidelines was outlining that for news to be effectively received and understood by an audience, it must be attention holding. Lets face it, not every newsworthy story is interesting. I'll be the first to admit that I would much rather read about a mysterious disappearance than what tax-bill was denied. Thats just part of human nature. My point here is that journalists have a much bigger job than a lot of people realize. It is very common for the most important news to be somewhat boring, and for the not so newsworthy content to be very engaging. This is where good journalism comes in. I am not saying that every story has to keep the reader on the edge of their seat, however, it is a large responsibility of the writer to hold attention long...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Closer Look at Both Sides of Mass Communication

As a technologically developed and advanced culture, we are able to identify and utilize multiple mass communication outlets at any given time or place. These timeless messages often serve a valid and important purpose, however they are very easy to abuse, and can also have negative impacts. After the class discussion regarding mass communication, I sat down to create a written analyzation of these benefits and drawbacks. To think positively, mass communication has innumerable benefits that the world, and modern society, would struggle to function without. One example of this is the spread of art and culture, as well as the interdependence that mass communication globally creates. Especially through public social media, mass communication is used to connect with people across the globe almost immediately. Every day thousands of ideas, information, and aspects of culture are diffused, making everyone with access to public accounts aware of what is going on in places that they are unab...
Post a Comment
Read more

power of the people (as a unit)

After our joint class discussion today in class regarding the past 72 hours of hate crimes and tragedies throughout the nation, I walked away feeling empowered by the words of my teachers and peers. Realizing that we are only a joined class of 48, it made me think about the influential power of those around us, and the power in the people as a unit. I remembered going to March For Our Lives and hearing the chant, "ain't no power like the power of the people, 'cause the power of the people don't stop..." It really sank in that even though we are encouraged (and very much able) to use our individual voices to speak up and defend our beliefs, we are much more likely and much more enabled to speak up as a whole, knowing that as a group, we can defend each other. I think this sense of place really combats the issue that Mrs. Palmer astutely brought up about the fear of the cynic that will always have negative feedback. Being in a group gives many the voice that they ot...
Post a Comment
Read more